Greg, please tell me you dont seriously think that is the case?
Kimi is tearing her hair out behind the scenes trying to get resolution to the major issues; ie the ones preventing people playing at all while at the same time trying to *do what they do* with the remainder.
Did you read my post in that thread?
15000+ posts on the forums in 8 days.
Just stop for a minute and try and imagine the man hours it takes to collate something constructive from that?
We have 4 Kimi please talk to us threads, at least 7 "this is what we want in the patch" threads, countless repatition of the same bugs in
seperate threads, I could go on an on.
Then throw into this the fact that the [f*cking] UK support site Q&A support system fell over...
You will never hear me defend UBI for shipping a game in this condition, but be realistic about what to expect wrt a patch.
I dont have ANY inside knowledge atm of this, so I am speculating now, but you basically have two options when shipping a game.
1. Have key issues you know about ready to be fixed with a patch on or around launch day/week
or
2. Wait a week or two to get
all the major issues for consideration for resolution in the 1st patch.
1 = Happier customers straight off but might take longer to resolve new issues
2 = Unhappy customers until the [sh*t] is fixed, but by only patching it once the shareholders are happier - any SW release costs an overhead in QA and distribution
I think its safe to say which model is being followed here, but it appears that the level of problems has actually taken them by suprise - just judging from the number of unresolved issues.
BTW sorry if this is coming across as a rant at you, its not meant to be, just letting of some steam which I cant do over there
